|
Meeting
People as Individuals |
|
|
|
|
|
What Do We Do With Bias? |
|
|
|
1 - Be honest with yourself and evaluate the biases you have |
|
2 - Be aware of biases others may think you have. |
|
3 - Be direct about the bias issue |
|
“Please ask me if you think that I may be biased.” |
|
4 - Be aware of the potential biases of others |
|
3 - Once biases are identified and evaluated we must decide how to deal with them. |
|
Some Ideas: |
|
compensate |
|
educate: self &/or others. Do not always strike while the iron is hot. Teaching moments = learning moments. |
|
reframe |
|
question: Would you tell me about what’s happening here? It seems like you keep __ |
|
stay awake / remain awake |
|
ignore: “The art of being wises is the art of knowing what to overlook.” William James |
|
· Try to become sensitive – perceptive and compassionate about others. |
|
· Try not to become Sensitive – constantly worried about saying or doing anything that somehow might offend someone, as this can obstruct the open, honest discussion of important subjects. |
|
· Resist becoming SENSITIVE – easily offended or prone to inventing new ways to be offended. |
|
· Use encounters with diversity as opportunities to develop a better understanding of your own belief system – values, emotions, perceptions, and assumptions – particularly in regard to the ways in which you think about and engage diversity. |
|
· Constructive multiculturalism is an ongoing process of improvement, not an ultimate goal that you reach. |
|
(Dr. Carlos E. Cortes) |
|
· Seek to understand involves a very deep shift in paradigm. We typically seek first to be understood. Most people to not listen with the intent to understand: they listen with the intent to reply. They’re speaking or preparing to speak. They’re filtering everything through their own paradigms, reading their autobiography into other peoples lives. |
|
(Stephen Covey) |
|
|
|
Rebecca Caselli-Smith |
|
|
|
RACIAL IDENTITY DEVELOPMENT |
|
|
FIGURE 1 MINORITY
IDENTITY DEVELOPMENT MODEL* (Adapted form Atkinson, Morten, and Sue, 1979) |
FIGURE 2 WHITE
RACIAL CONSCIOUSNESS MODEL* (Adapted form Helm, 1984) |
|
STAGE ONE CONFORMITY
STAGE 1.
Identifies more
strongly with dominant culture values. 2.
Lacks awareness
of an ethnic perspective 3.
Exhibits negative
attitudes toward self and others as part of an ethnic group 4.
Accepts and
believes stereotypes prevalent in society about self and group. STAGE TWO DISSONANCE
STAGE 1.
Experiences
confusion and conflict about the values and beliefs developed in Stage One. 2.
Actively
questions dominant culture values. 3.
Becomes aware
of issues involving racism, sexism, oppression, etc. 4.
Identifies with
the history of the personal cultural group. 5.
Has
feelings of anger and loss. 6.
Seeks role model
from the cultural group to which on belongs. STAGE
THREE RESISTANCE
AND IMMERSION STAGE 1.
Actively and
forcefully rejects and distrusts the dominant culture. 2.
Demonstrates
greater identification and own culture group. 3.
Immerses into
ethnic history, traditions, foods, language, etc. 4.
Begins to
exhibit activist behavior with motivation toward combating oppression,
racism, and sexism. 5.
Might separate frorm the dominant culture. STAGE FOUR INTROSPECTION
STAGE 1.
Questions rigid
rejection of dominant culture values. 2.
Experiences
conflict and confusion regarding loyalty to one’s own cultural group and
personal autonomy. 3.
Struggles for
self-awareness continuously. STAGE FIVE SYNERGETIC
ARTICULAITON AND AWARENESS STAGE 1.
Resolves many
of the conflicts exemplified in Stage Four. 2.
Has a sense of
fulfillment regarding personal cultural identity. 3.
Increases an
appreciation for other cultural groups, as well as dominant cultural values. 4.
Selectively
accepts or rejects dominant culture values based upon prior experience. 5.
Is motivated to
eliminate all forms of oppression. |
STAGE ONE CONTACT
STAGE 1.
Becomes aware
that black (minority) people exist. 2.
Characterizes
naively interactions and knowledge about blacks (minorities). 3.
Tends to ignore
differences or regard them as unimportant (people are people). 4.
Is unaware of
self as a racial being (does not know what it means to be white). 5.
Becomes aware
of societal pressures that accompany cross-racial interactions. 6.
Seeks
resolution through withdrawal or approach. STAGE TWO DISINTEGRATION
STAGE 1.
Becomes aware
of racism, which leads to guilty, depression, and negative feelings. Is
forced to acknowledge that he or she is white. 2.
Is caught
between internal standards of human decency and external cultural
expectations. 3.
Responds to
this dilemma in one of three ways: a. Over identifies with blacks (minorities). b. Becomes paternalistic towards blacks (minorities) c. Retreats back into the white culture. STAGE
THREE REINTERGRATION
STAGE 1.
Become hostile toward
blacks (minorities) and more positively biased toward own racial group
(prejudice). 2.
Overtly or
covertly becomes anti-black (minority). 3.
Views or
perceives black (minority) traits as negative. STAGE FOUR PSEUDO-INDEPENDENT
STAGE
STAGE FIVE AUTONOMY
STAGE
|
|
WORKING ACROSS COLOR LINES |
|
|
|
Social change groups time
and again find themselves tied into knots over how to work across likes of
race, ethnicity, and class. Two young organizers, one of African descent and one
of European descent, led a discussion at the State of the Possible retreat2
on their success working across racial lines. With input form other participants, these are some of the Do’s and Don’ts that
emerged for making out communities stronger and more diverse. |
|
|
|
·
If your
organization is now predominantly white, DO
prepare your organization to be inclusive of people of color [and differing
economic classes]. |
|
|
|
·
DO
consider whether your organization has unwritten barriers to participation by
people of color or those with limited financial resources. |
|
|
|
·
Do pay
attention to the language you use—is it “in-group” language that assumes
shared life experiences and world views? Is it inclusive? |
|
|
|
·
Do
consider whether you have an organizational culture that is welcoming to
people with diverse styles, ways of relating, and backgrounds. |
|
|
|
·
DON’T ask
people of color to raise the consciousness of an organization or to help
white people process their guilt or pain. |
|
|
|
·
DO honestly
process your own feelings and beliefs through diversity training, readings,
and discussions with friends and colleagues who have similar concerns. |
|
|
|
·
DO reach out
to organizations led by people of color to find commend ground. Look for
places where your issues link up. |
|
|
|
·
DO make a
long-term commitment to the “never-ending dance of love and respect” that
forms the basis for solid partnerships. |
|
|
|
·
DON’T wait
until the agenda has been set or the plan drawn up to invite participation by
people of color. |
|
|
|
·
DO make
sure that you have diversity at the table as a means to access the wisdom of
a range of life experiences and perspectives. |
|
|
|
·
DO pay attention
to the nature of the “table” around which you are gathering. Who is in
charge? Who is invited? Who is paying the costs? |
|
|
|
·
DO consider
engaging in anti-racism work as part of your organization’s mission. |
|
|
|
·
DO plan occasions
where people can meet informally across race, ethnic, and class lines and
deepen relationships. |
|
|
|
|
|
1 Article by Sarah Ruth Van Gelder,
YES! A Journal of Positive Futures, Spring 2001, Page 59. Reprinted by
permission. |
|
2 A series of retreats held by the Positive Futures
Network. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Culturally Competent
Professional
An Informal Self-Assessment
|
Please rate yourself on the
following descriptions. There are no right or wrong answers.
This will help you to determine areas where you feel greater competency and
confidence, and areas in need of development or continued improvement. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
What is Cultural Competence? |
|
|
|
Cultural competence is a set of congruent
behaviors, attitudes, policies, structures that come together in a system
that enables people to work effectively in cross cultural situations. |
|
|
|
|
|
What are the attributes of culturally competent professionals? |
|
|
|
They are Individuals
who are: |
|
~~~~committed to the process of change, viewing
an organization’s diversity goals as a catalyst for positive individual and
organizational growth; |
|
~~~~knowledgeable about the organizational culture
and willing to facilitate its diversity goals; |
|
~~~~knowledgeable about the history of the
workforce diversity focus in the |
|
~~~~interpersonally competent, able to communicate
effectively with all segments of the workforce; |
|
~~~~perceived as leaders, willing to take risks
and lend support; |
|
~~~~self-aware about their own dimensions of
identity and how these influence their daily interactions; |
|
~~~~responders versus reactors; |
|
~~~~not afraid of conflict, rather they can
facilitate it among others and personally respond to it with skill; |
|
~~~~creative thinkers, able to think
“out-of-the-box”; |
|
~~~~team players, willing to collaborate and share
information; and |
|
~~~~always willing to learn from others and
through formal and informal channels. |
|
Patricia Arredondo |
|
|
|
Rebecca Caselli-Smith |
|
NCBI Philosophy |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
* Everyone and every group counts. |
||||
|
* A tone of joy and optimism gives people hope. |
||||
|
* Confronting the misinformation we’ve learned about other people and
groups moves us forward together. |
||||
|
* Guilt, rigid politeness, unexpressed anger, and disappointment in
others can keep prejudice in place. |
||||
|
* Welcoming and valuing diversity requires risk-taking and willingness
to make mistakes and clean them up. |
||||
|
* Generosity is the key to across-group relationships. |
||||
|
* Listening to the stories of others changes hearts, attitudes, and
behavior. |
||||
|
* Knowing how to build effective allies can break the traditional
cycles of mistrust. |
||||
|
* Everyone has the capacity to lead the workplace in welcoming and valuing
diversity. |
||||
|
* Creating community is about courageous and principled leadership. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Moving Towards Multicultural Competence |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Rebecca Caselli-Smith |
||||
|
Lutheran Social Services |
||||
|
348-0477 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Cultural competence is a set of congruent and
evolving behaviors, attitudes, policies and structures that when lived both
professionally and personally enable people to work effectively in
cross cultural situations. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
A most helpful model in understanding the complex combination of influences that effect our world view in relationship to diversity and multiculturalism was developed by Cox. |
||||
|
If
only – Isolation ←Who we are |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Individual
Uniqueness |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
(More
alike) Food,
Shelter, Belonging If
only – all the same limited compassion Language,
Age, Education, Economics, Race |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Human Universality Cultural Specificity |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
If
only → Us & Them |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
“Within this frame work one can see that the current approach to multiculturalism has focused almost exclusively on the culturally specific sphere…The emphasis on one sphere or another is and understandable attempt to simplify and untangle the complex blending of influences on individuals. It is the complexity, the interrelatedness of the three broadly defined spheres, however that is most illuminating…Although the unique contributions of each of the three spheres is important, only in combination can they begin to capture the richness of individuals”** |
||||
|
|
||||
|
*Arredondo, P. and D’Andrea, M.,
(1995). AMCD Approves Multicultural Counseling, Competency Standards, Counseling
Today |
||||
|
|
||||
|
**Speight, S.L., Myers, L.J., Cox, C.I., and Highlen. P.S. (1991). A Redefinition of Multicultural Counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 29-36. |