NOTE: Robb DeWall interview with Ron Stephenson, County Commissioner at the time of the flood. (Documents preserved as a text duplication with strikouts and hand written comments removed.) RON STEPHENSON TAPES: Interview 9-9-72 page 1 of tape 1 DEWALL:The first question I want to ask you is were there every any official warnings such as sirens to the community in advance of the flood? STEPHENSON:There were no sirens that I know about, but as far as official warnings there were official warnings done by the sheriff's department, fire department and police department. DEWALL: What time? STEPHENSON: These times I'm not really sure of, because I wasn't involved at that stage of the flood. DEWALL: Early evening? STEPHENSON: Yes, they started at around 6:30 or in this area, now you"ll be able to determine this exactly when you talk to city officials. they have that. DEWALL: But what form did they take? STEPHENSON: They would have taken the form of radio announcements of tv announcements when thos started; and going out to such as the school where i was, going out to the Stevens school and warning the people there, and any public function where they went in and announced, and where they went to the homes themselves in the flood area and spread out and gave the flood information. This was primarily done by the National Guard, the police department and the fire deparment, the sheriff-s office. DEWALL: Now this is later in the evening...after 10 or... STEPHENSON: Yes, it actually started really strongly around 8 with REACT people involved. DEWALL: Your comment is interesting because we at KOTA were never notified by local police until wayafter 10 o*clock, and the only communication we had was through the state highway patrol, and that was for a long time .just for outlying areas. In your opinion were the early radio and tv bulletins on the developing flood threat adequate? STEPHENSON:Well I don't want to blame anyone, but strictly from the standpoint of the warning it ~vas not, and in my opinion it could be changed and improved. And, in this way: first we have to get more accurate and more intelligent information to the media in an official capacity. We must decide ahead of time who has the right to give this official information in other words there would have to be more than one and would have to be places where media could get confirmation quickly if they were't sure because you could throw the community into panic if someone just flagrantly called up and said well there's a wall of water coming down a certain canyon. We had this happen the following week or so. And I would say the most important thing is we in civil defense sit down now, and now's the time to do that--~we've been waiting until our new director is named because we feel he should be involved in this planning-- and there's a pretty remote chance of a flood this time of the year, and ~we felt this could be delayed until that time, and until more recovery things are done. In other words our time now is spent mostly on recovery and federal programs and so on. Now we have to sit down in this next month and really determine this warning system. How it could be best handled and who should be responsible for it. I have some ideas as to what I think about it, but that will be determined by a group board action. STEPHENSON TAPES...page 2 of tape 1 DEWALL: But you feel that the early warnings, say from 6:30 to 8:30 were not adequate on radio and television? STEPHENSON: If radio and television wasn’t notified until 10 o.clock, then obviously it wasn.t accurate, it 'wasn’t good.After 10 o'clock the streamers, in my opinion, were of no value or of very little value. DEWALL: You mean the crawl across the TV screen? STEPHENSON: The crawl across the screen. The people, many. many. many of them . I personally interviewed. said they didn't even notice it, or pay any attention to it...especially older people. these are people whose attention must be gotten because they have lived many, many years and they’re used to the safety and the "it never happened before type thing." , DEWALL: You think we should have interrupted the TV programming with a vocal bulletin? STEPHENSON: Yes. And I'm not saying this is anybody's fault. With all of the things that happened, I"m certainly not infering that, because who knew at that time, but I think in the future we would be remiss if we didn't set up a program where on any emergency say a tornado or fire an explosion a bad accident, for instance a bomber that might crash in Rapid City in an area that might be heavily populated or anything that might cause or create risk to larger numbers of people above the capaicty of the normal capacity of the sheriff's office or police department to cope with. And in these cases I would think that a warning should be given, the program should be stopped, the announcer should give the information and this should be done in a very strong, aggressive, but not panicy way. And I think that this would be wise for the media to have test trys on this privately in their own organizations. In other words you have to take into complete consideration your staff that is on duty. who would have this responsibility. because it's a responsible spot to give somthing of this natures on radio or on TV. and I think that this is a problem within the media, and at the time we're ready to discuss this I intend to call a meeting of all the media that would be involved in that and have an open discussion on this and come up with some ideas. DEWALL:Ron, how extensive was the communications black-out in the city during the period from midnight until dawn? STEPEHENSON: You’d have to get that from telephone and power companies, I don't know those exact figures. DEWALL: from the civil defense standpoint, why the delay in getting the EBS on the air after the KOTA po~ver failure? STEPHENSON: This is a very important thing, something I’ve looked into. I' I've talked with Mr. Boreman at WCCO in Minneapolis, and he's very concerned about this. He's been very active in civil defense and certainly the EBM. I believe that!we should immediately install at either civil defnese or state and county expence~or both an immeidate automatic switch to power so that we don't have this delay again in getting on the air after a power outage.We had a couple of hour delay, and only the fact I think that Stu Steele was in the control headquarters and helped to getus back on again...with his help. I mean his liason, I don't know how much technical experience he has in this area,but he did a good job in getting us going. And, it seems to me I was back on again in about two hours. I don't know exactly. You'd have those figures. I'd like to know in fact. STEPHENSON TAPES...page 3 of tape 1 DEWALL: Who has the responsibility to make the decision that EBS would be used? STEPHENSON: I think this should be automatic. I think when power goes out at the radio station at the transmitter when their power goes out...ours always is on, we have automatic power at the courthouse at civil defense...the minute that's automatic... DEWALL: In any kind of situation whether an emergency or not? STEPHENSON: Well.I think it wouldprobably. I don't know how you're going to tell. How are you going to know when this happens. I think that it should be anytime'. Because disasters don't go by timetables or clock or anything else. We assume that when power goes out there's got to be some reason for that power going out. It's probably some kine of an emergency. It might be a car hitting a post and knocking it out but I can't see it would be any deterrent or harm if you're not officially on the air, if you don't have an announcer out there or something. What differnce is it going to make really? But have it there and have it available for us there. I would think it would be very valuable. Here's another thing: that enters my mind. You have certain numbers of people what would go out there and get things hooked up. Okay, I'd like to know how much effort does it take? Eor example say something happens after your normal sign-off time. Your man has left the station, you have nobody there. How do we get you back on the air if that man iskilled or that man is delayed or he can't get to the station? or the transmitter. How do we get on the air again from civil defense headquarters automatically? This is something I think we ought to look at. I don't know if it can be done technically, but I think it's something that ought to be looked into. Because you can’t determine just as our Civil Defense Director couldn't be here he was not here on the job where we needed him, so how do we know your technicians will be avaiable. or who. or who determines this? It wouldn"t matter how much capability we had if we can't get it turned on and get it going. Then we can't produce. This is something we have to take a look at. And Boreman was concerend about this. They are on 24 hours a day so they don't have that problem, but I'm sure many stations aren't. DEWALL: But they could still have a power failure and be knocked off as wewere? STEPHENSON: well, no they're automatic. Just as Soon as they loose their power they switch over...just like the hospital does. they have an automatic switch on. DEWALL:was the EBS the only source of information in the city during the critical rescue and recovery operation on the lOth? STEPHENSON: well it was only way we had to get to the public. We had other forms of communication such as REACT that were scattered all over. We had police and sheriff's office and some help from ham radio... DEWALL: but in terms of public information... STEPHENSON: Public information. the only thing you had was EBM. DEWALL:The other stations were all off the air? STEPHENSON: They were off as far as our being able to make a public announcement. Now we tied up, you know you don't 'want to tie up your phones too much, but after the first day KIMM got back on the air or they were on the air I think, but we had a direct line to them. We tried to make it fair. DEWALL: But during the critical period EBS was exclusively on the air? STEPHENSON: That's the only one. DEWALL: There were other stations taking the EBS feed I understand. Does this have merit? STEPHENSON TAPES. ...page 4 of tape 1 STEPHENSON: I don't know, if that was done it was done by KOTA. We didn- authorize that...and I’ll be real honest, I have some mixed emotions about that. Much information that is directly concerned locally it's not always good to have that information go out to a wide extent. For instance, I'm talking about clothing. we wereappealing for certain things on a local basis, and when people hear this all over the US and the world, why I surpose our appeal gave the impression we were in a real critical situation--and no question we were" by this time, everybodywas getting aware of the immensness of it. But they misinterpreted it to the point that tons and tons of clothing and things came in that created an additional problem for us that we weren't able to cope with. NA place to put it or store it and how do you turn off compassion. You don' want to turn it off, you want these peopel to understand we need their help, but when you've got all the clothing you need, you don't need tons and tons more of it. Just something that causes a tremendous problem. We were able to take care of it by a fantastic effort by Ellsworth Air Force Base, Salvation Army and volunteers, they just simply dug in an inventoried it and took care of it. But many times we'd have to hold trucks at Mitchell or Sioux Falls or Utah. People got the wrong impression then, they felt we weren't concerned, we don't want their help. We need it, but in a direction that will help us. We need to control what goes out so they don't just send all clothing for example. or not all like at one time we had plentyof certain things and yet they still were pouring in. and had we been able to a little bit getter organize this. Now this is partly our own fault as we should have had someone at civil defense who could do this at the very beginning--like Henry Baker took this job of the coordination down there of this particular thing--we had one person in charge of all this material that was coming in. Now he had the complete picture, but when we have the Mayor making calls or myself making calls over the radio and then somebody else, maybe Ellsworth of Salvation Army of Red Cross and all of them not coordinated very ,well. This is something in the future you could have all planned out ahead of time. DEWALL: At the height of the emergency--say noon on June lOth--how many persons would you say were involved in the command post in the courthouse in the civil defense headquarters. STEPHENSON: at the height, you mean the morning of Saturday. Oh. I'd say there Were, well, you know, if you don't take your police andsheriff operating out of Here, also the recovery operation of bodies and the identification operation was working out of there. Later we dispersed some of this througout the courthouse. I think maybe what you're saying to me is at the command post we probably had 15 to 20 people in authoritiative positions who could use the hot line phones who used for instance the sheriff and chief of police... DEWALL: Directing how many volunteers and workers in the field? STEPHENSON: Oh. thousands. We were moving 19-hundred in the guard along, and all that direction came right out of that control down there through the national guard. DEWALL: In the absence of the Civil Defense Director. who was in charge or what was the chain of command. STEPHENSON: This just happened. I happened to get there and was working with the sheriff's office with a deputy out on rescue operations. warning actually. I was caught down here at Omaha and West Boulevard just off a block up. And we were taking people out of those trailers and so on, and the way it hit was when we got caught we had to wait there until the water went down on Omaha, and we send down the medium, you know the higher area, and got our car down there. and then we started rescue operations. people who were burned and going into the houses and getting some of the people out and so on. STEPHENSON TAPES...page 5 of tape 1 STEPHENSON(CON"T):I saw some dead bodies and saw the immensity of it. I saw the sheriff there, and I suggested we ought to get back to the headquarts, and he agreed, and we went back. When we got there, Ron Messerthen cam in and the fire chief was there, and I think George Behrens was there, and myself, and I think Don Barnett was there, and the question came up, who was in charge. Well, Don right away wanted to get out into the action, he wanted to get out where things were happening and help with what he coudl do out there, and the sheriff was chairman of the civil defense board. Mr. Irish was not there. Sheriff being chairman, and of course having experience in all kinds of rescue efforts, so immediately we said well, Glenn you be the honcho, and I was to be his assistant because I-was on the civil defense board and I-was a county official which had some authority through the elective position. What happened was that Glenn immediately was called into his own action working with his own deputies and police in enforcement and in rescue leaving me alone to kind of take it over and run it. Ijust got so because I -was the one there I just became it. It was just one of those things. Going back, I mean we've learned. If you want som comments on it and what I think about it, let me tell you this: We went back throughour official legal program that we have on civil defense, the book in other words--that I hadn't read--and when you look at it. I was the logical one to have taken over command. The reason for it is they recommend the top county or city, depending on where the disaster takes place, be the one who has the responsiblity or his designated appointee or whoever would be invovled down the line, In orhter words, LLOYD St. Pierre. maybe would have been the one because county super cedes the city in government. Alright, then LLoyd normally would have been the one normally. But Lloyd was in the flood disaster, he was in a tree with his family.Walt Taylor is co-chairman of the county commission, but he was involved. His wife had just had an operation that day in the hospital, and he was out in the valley and had no way of getting in, he was in the flood area himself.Consequently, and I was on the civil defense board, and I did have some experience in civil defense through knowledge of what when on...where the radios ware and things like this. We also had a program direct I had worked with in civil defense, our regular program gal who sets up the program, but she had a bad cold, larengitis. so bad she couldn't even talk all she could do is whisper. So obviously she couldn't get on the radio and this type of thing and really wasn't qualified for it. And, I suprose because of my background in tv and radio--see I've had a TV show for almost lO years of my life and on radio I did News, weather and sports. I did football boradcasts years ago. so I at least knew what a microphone was and could feel comfortable there in front of one. So I think it just kind of got to be because I could do it and was there and had some authority I got the job. And, as it turns out, add this might be just fluke, but as it turns out I would have been, had everything been official, I would have been the logical one to have been selected in the manner of chain of command. DEWALL: how then do you assess the performance of EBS during that critical period on Saturday, June lOth? STEPHENSON:I don't know how it could have been finer. I don't kno~y how ~ye could have had better response or I'm sure that as soon as poeple realized that there was away to get information, and radio of course at least six o'clock in the morning they knew at five that KOTA comes on. So within a couple of hours of normal when we went on they could come on and hear through transister radios and some regular radios and cars. STEPHENSON TAPES...page 6 of tape 1 DEWALL: Well, do you feel that EBS helped forestall a wider panic in the community than there already was? STEPHENSON: Well Ive had people who came up to me who even claim that we saved their lives even prior to the when KOTA went off the air. DEWALL: In what way? STEPHENSON: Well, they heeded the warning and they got out.And then also when we went on apparently there were still some areas that were still being flooded down below and areas in which they were able to get out and get going. And I've had people come up and put their arms around me and say you saved my life. I don't know if i did. I think maybe they're confused somewhat by things that have happened since, but how do you answer it. DEWALL: Did the public respond to specific messages put out over EBS? STEPHENSON: Excellent.No question. In getting people to ...for instance if we needed volunteers. We'd ask for volunteers and we’d get them in any capacity. For the first week we couldn't even handle all the volunteers who would come in response to radio. This was a lifesaver. DEWALL: My particular concern is still that day after when things were so confused. ~ STPEHENSON:Even at that stage, as soon as people became aware that they had a communication they used it and they listened. I don't think there was a place that had a radio that could use it didn't have it on. Getting to that stage. one of the recommendations I am going to make is that a large number of transistor radios be placed at certain places in the community, for instance at Sioux San. the schools. things of this nature where people would know they were there for emergency use and the batteries kept up to date. Because if we could have had even 100 transisotor messages that night we could have done a lot more becasue we could have communicated to wide numbers of volunteers who were out there. Because. you know, people lost a lot of radios in the flood area. You don't think of picking up a radio when you're trying to save your life. DEWALL:In this situation, was it helpful to have a familiar voice on that EBS mike? stephenson: You mean my voice and your voice. No question about it. DEWALL: someone people knew? STEPHENSON: No question about it, Rob, and I think that's very imporant with you being there and you kowning me and visa versa. There was a trust that we had. The minute I needed something I could snap that switch and you would respond, and I didn't have to baloney around about it and go up the line someplace. I think it would be wise that those of us in civil defense who are going to be involved in this in the future, or the directors or whomever, should know and work out programs and actually have trials and exercises so that we become completely familiar with you people and that you become familiar with us. Because it's possible to get a nut on there both down there and both places. and then you really have a tough communications problem. STEPHENSON TAPES...page 7 of tape 1 DEWALL: That begs my next question:do you think it's helpful when you got to EBS that you have a trained professional broadcaster to handle the mike? STEPHENSON: It's imparative, vitally imparative. If you don’t have this. Wel; it's just experience, People respond i"ve found to a calm assured voice on radio in other words in an emergency like this. In other words if your voice is gonna be a strained panic and “my God what's happened to us," this would be terrible. If you take it like it's a business deal this is it, bing! we're doing this, we're doing that. I think the thing that's come back to me from many many places is the fact that they really felt we were under control from the very beginning, and this is what Gen. Corning and all the people in the state and federalhave very highly congradulated us. DEWALL: Since I was the mike the first ]3 hours with you and so many others over there, I want you to comment on the tone of the broadcast. STEPHENSON: Well the tone, you understand I never heard the broadcast, I was on the other end of it. I did have a little portable radio after while on which we could hear some comments. but I was so busy. I'd have six or eight people behind me all the time asking. . .this and this. Only time I was on the radio, I'd get on radio only when something real important. DEWALL: I gave a running commentary rather than just interupting rather than just giving bulletins. Rather a continuous narrative. STEPHENSON:well you were always...and you were getting your information other than from us and you were able to perform well, and it was necessary for us also to hear. there was some confusion at different times on information that was coming through that wasn't cleared through our emergency controls. DEWALL: But this was later... STEPHENSON: Mostly I would say.I don't think it happened as long as you and I I were working together. Down at the control center. I think I was practically on it along the first six, eight or 10 hours. I don"t think there were very many others that you talked to down there were there? DEWALL: Yes, we had interviews from the very beginning with many officals. STEPHENSON: Like the sheriff and the mayor and things like that...Did that all mostly come from our control headquarters? See this is a dream to me, I don't remember all these things . All I remember was that I was just going steady, making decisions, buying automobiles, things like this. DEWALL: have you been told anecdotes from citizens saying that the early broadcasts or the EBS had some direct effect on their survivial? STEPHENSON: no question about that. DEWALL. WHAT would be the most striking example you've been told. STEPHENSON: I just...I tell you there's so many I couldn’t answer. I know so many came Up to me when Mrs. Nixon was out here that day, which was just a week after the flood and it was fresh in everbody"s mind, I just about couldn"t get out of there. Just one person after another come up and put their arms around you and they-d be crying, it affected me so much, I just I know this was all based on what you're asking me. Actually maybe I should say this. Maybe from the overal experience of that night being in the public for the first time after the disaster, it was overwhelming. Just no question they were deeply affected, and it all came through radio. . RON STEPHENSON TAPE INTERVIEW[Transcript[9-9-72 page on -tape 2 DEWALL: You said that the early warnings on radio and television were not adequate, but later you said that many people had said radio and television had saved their lives. RN: When I said they were*t adequate, I don't think anything is adequate unless the maximum isn't done at that time, and that that doesn't mean at all that what they did wasn't good...sure better than not doing anything. But I'm saying and I'm not really saying that we could have saved any more lives, I think this is something we just don't know. I don't think we could ever prove this, but I've talked to many people who said they sat right through the television thing and never even saw it. ..never even saw it. (interuption for telephone call) DEWALL: the missing list of some 4,000 names was read on KOTA Radio. Was this effective? STEPHENSON: Yes, but it never should have been necessary. and I have a report on that that I will be using. DEWALL: Was it the broadcasting of names originally of people who were reported missing that inflated the missing list? STEPHENSON:RIGHT. What we should have done was to have somebody with an experienced mind..ah, in other words, like a lawyer, a guy who's acquainted with questioning. Now could be a lawyer or could be a police officer. but what' I'm saying is there are certain things you need to ask about those people. For instance:what can you tell me, where was he when he was missing. who was he with, who are the other people with him. Who do we call to notify to find out, ,who are the nearest people who know him or should be notified if he should be found. We had two-thousand names that shouldn*t have been on the list. They came down on our list. They were done by our girls from calls that came in saying some body was missing. She wouldn't ask any more questions hardly...maybe a few more. They'd say, "My dad's gone." and we put the name on the list. Okay. DEWALL:After you got a varified list, was there the indication there that the broadcasting of the list would help. STEPHENSON: Oh. yeah. we knocked off after those broadcasts huge chunks of them with people calling in. DEWALL: Ron. I want to talk about the radio-television special on KOTA the Sunday night after the flood in which all the officials for the first time were brought together for a live panel discussion to answer questions called in. STEPHENSON: That was good. I did't go up to that because I was busy. DEWALL: I felt it was an important psychological turning point in terrors of of the public being told for the first time what potential there was for recovery. Did you get any feedback along this line? STEPHENSON: Well it was very good. I think that probably the personnel, for instance, I felt there were some people up there couldn't give the answers properly, they just didn’t have that much experience, but because they were going to be on television they accepted and went up and did it. but the people who had the answers, most of them were still down there working...and when those answers came across, sometimes I just sort of cringed a little bit because they weren’t just exactly what we wanted them to say. RON STEPHENSON TAPES page 2 tape 2 DEWALL: But didn't you think it had a reassuring impact on the community? STEPHENSON: Oh yes. Overall it was good. but I think one of the things I'd do in the future...or the media might do in the futures to come down to the control headquarters (I think there was always a little question where authority was on your part)and this is where we got into a lot of trouble latter on. I mean the mayor would call up and you'd accept it from the mayor. naturally. But. the mayor. this is an area I don't want it to go out. but he did. you know. it was tough for us down there.. DEWALL: Speaking of that. one simple question: does the mayor have power to declare marshall law? STEPHENSON: I got into enough trouble on that once. I'd better not comment. The answer, of course, is he does not, as such. He does, however, by getting it through proper authorities. It was answered in that paper (article), and he did have the authority there, but I was told by Gen. Corning and others he actually does not have that authority, but he naturally could have it by simply asking for it through Gen. Corning or the Governor, and he could get it. DEWALL: This is very important, now. I want to refer to the second flood threat. And the question is this: Do you think that the emotional warnings the Mayor and Bill Duhamel gave on radio and TV the night of the second flood stirred panic in the community? STEPHENSON: I don't think it did at that time. I think it could have , I think it was right on the edge. DEWALL: It should not have been handled that way? STEPHENSON: I thinkthat ,I think, and I cann't say...I was in the same boat I was concerned and I was on the way down. I don't think I would have quite had the panic. and would have tried to keep my voice a little more under control but still with an urgency. Ithink it was a little unprofessional from the media standpoint. You know. I just felt that it was a little bit unprofessional. You can't tell the mayor how to talk. he was worried and nervous and upset and what he said he meant and he was sincere in it. and he did the right thing in my opinion. but you have to be so careful how you say this or bring it out where it might be in print or any thing because it can be misinterpreted so easily. Yes. I think he did the right thing with w at he had and the information he had and with them telling us there was a wall of water coming down there. We didn't know. I think on that basis he did the right thing. DEWALL: WE go back to that matter of tone. STEPHENSON: Right. now again. I think if another week had gone by and we'd had another flood, I don't think the mayor would have actually done it that way. How in the world are you going to train consecutive mayors and all the rest of the people who might be doing this. DEWALL: In the final analysis, do you believe the media must always have the final responsibility for what it broadcasts?Even when emergency warnings involved. STEPHENSON: I think the media has this responsibility, but I think the media, in an emergency declared by the President has the responsiblity to be willing to accept the final word of the authority in charge. In other words if it doesn' happen to agree with your thinking... t RON STEPHENSON TAPES page 3 of tape 2 DEWALL: Well, give me a specific example. STEPHENSON: Well, I can't give you one exactly. But I"m saying for instance... DEWALL: Now we"re not talking about an EBS situation. STEPHENSON: Oh. you*re talking about later on. DEWALL: Either before or after (EBS). But not during EBS becaise: that"s when government is just using a station"S transmitting facilities. STEPHENSON: My thought is this. Say a civil defense director has information and the media announcer, or whoever is in charge up there, says well, I don't really think it's that serious,and I'm not going to do it that way. Then I think that director should have the final authority as to the intensity of the warning. DEWALL: But he still hasn't got any control over the media. STEPHENSON: He still hasn't got any control over it, but he'd only be able to do it because he asked him to do it. And I think he should be given that authority over any announcer who might, now I'm not talking about you or anybody else particularly, but I can visualize a guy sitting up there and having his own ideas about civil defense...and who says I'm not going to go that way. That director is sitting there saying we've got a problem, we've got a disaster. and I want this information to go out.Like this. I think they should accept it DEWALL:But a station still is responsible for what it broadcasts, even in that situation. STEPHENSON: How can you change it. I don't think the law allows you to change that. DEWALL: That would seem to indicate than an argument for a firm procedural advance plan between the broadcast medium and civil defense. STEPHENSON: Right. Now there you've said it. If the media itself will accept the divil defense board's recommendation to get together to come up with a plan that's acceptable to the civil defense board, fine.I can say that. But I can see a time if there ever would be this clash, then I think the authority, under an emergency of the president, should supercede if it came ever to that decision the officials of the civil authority, whomever, it might be a joint meeting of civil authority, it might be the mayor of county commission or council, or it might be a meeting, then I think they should have that final decision as to how that information, general, as to how it's put out. Like on a directive. Now I got, we got a lot of heat when we moved the media out of the control room into another room. We got a lot of heat there. Bill was one of them. But I feel that was the proper decision because there was great confusion in the control room which we just can't have anymore.That wasn't only media, that was a lot of other things. DEWALL:Did the media perform beyond the call of duty, and could you envision a emergency situation without the broadcasting industry? STEPHENSON: I CAn't envision it without the mec broadcast media. It would be a pure utter terror and panic continually. We could never have done what we did without it. I've so said to the FCC.I said it too the national broadcast magazine, and I -have done nothing but commend the media and KOTA in particularfor the role they played in it.To me there just couldn' be enough said about what it did. And the suffering and the saving of lives, that hospital was evaculated in the middle of the night, you know, and all this type of thing, and not a single loss of life there. And this was all helped by the communications that we were able to establish to get the volunteers necessary and all the other things. RON STEPHENSON TAPES...page 4 of tape 2 DEWALL: Were there times when the lack of two-way radios made you rely on EBS to give direct messages to rescue crews in the field. STEPHENSON: Oh, I'm sure that many times when radios might have gone out or things happened that might have interfered, they used transister radios. I cleaned my store out over here. I sent someone over here, I said take every transister radio you can that will work. And they did. They brought six of them back. and we put them out right there, but we should have had a hundred. DEWALL: Anything you'd care to comment on we may not have touched? STEPHENSON: No, not really. I want to commend you personally for the job you did. Disaster is more than the first night or the second. Disaster is recovery...and the aid that they've had in panel meetings, discussions. Now if I could make a suggestion to the media, to KOTA and others, I see where it might be a good idea for once a week during the weeks immediatly following the disaster and the recovery effort to have the same kind of a panel that you had, amaybe without quite so many people on it, who are knowledgable in the things that are happening currently and a phone in type of thing that would keep the public a little better informed on what"s happening every week for awhile...other than direct news information that goes out or that picked up.Because you open up a line of communication there to the public that in my opinion would be invaluable.